Search⌘K

Presets, tones & users

Define the underlying prompts and skill instructions Claude uses when a preset, tone, or user is selected.

Design preset

Infographic Elena

Label

Group

Design reference image (in-app preview only)

Shown in Studio as a visual preview of this preset. Not sent to Claude.

Attachment for Claude (optional)

Sent to Claude alongside the preset prompt whenever this preset is selected.

Primary prompt / skill instructions

Create a clean, modern editorial infographic poster in portrait 4:5 format with a light warm gray textured background and a muted terracotta / burnt orange + cream + black color palette. The design should look like a polished LinkedIn thought-leadership infographic for HR and global mobility leaders, with thin rounded borders, soft beige content panels, dark text, and orange title bars.

The theme is modernizing the global mobility vendor model for lean teams.

Main headline at top, very large bold sans-serif:

The Old Vendor Model Is Breaking

Highlight the words “Vendor Model” with a pale peach rounded rectangle background.

Subtitle below in a white rounded pill box:

A practical guide to building Vendor Model 2.0 for lean global mobility teams

Add a thin dotted divider line under the subtitle.

Section 1: Top framework diagram

Create a large rounded rectangle panel with a terracotta header bar containing:

Vendor Model 2.0
How modern mobility teams reduce dependency, improve control, and scale intelligently

Inside the panel, create a centered systems diagram:

Left small rounded beige box:

Old model

One large RMC
Limited flexibility
Markups and dependency
Low visibility into cost and performance
Center larger rounded light panel:

Main text:
The old vendor model made sense when mobility was simpler, budgets were larger, and few teams challenged cost or structure. Today’s mobility leaders need a smarter architecture — one that protects internal strengths, adds specialist capability where needed, and creates control without adding headcount.

Add label:
Core design elements

Add label:
Operating principles

Horizontal row of small rounded capsules:
Internal excellence | External precision | Zero wasted capacity

Right small rounded beige box:

What strong architecture looks like

Core partners for strategic volume
Specialists for complexity
Flex capacity for surges
Integrated data and clear accountability

Add simple left-right arrows linking the side boxes to the center.

Section 2: Two-column middle content

Create two large rounded panels side by side.

Left panel title:

What This Means for Your Mobility Team

Below title, add a centered beige callout with text:

The teams building real capacity right now are not adding headcount. They are building a smarter vendor architecture. The goal is not to outsource everything. It is to use the right vendor in the right role at the right moment — with full visibility, stronger accountability, and less dependency.

Then create a 2x2 grid of four cards:

Card 1 — green heading:

THE REALITY
Text:
One-vendor dependency does not create scale
Handing everything to one large provider may feel simple, but it often reduces flexibility, obscures costs, and limits control.

Card 2 — green heading:

THE OPPORTUNITY
Text:
A better vendor architecture multiplies what small teams can deliver
When vendors are segmented by role and connected properly, lean teams gain leverage without increasing headcount.

Card 3 — rust red heading:

THE RISK
Text:
Treating every vendor like a core partner creates leakage
That is where budget overruns, blurred ownership, and weak accountability begin to appear.

Card 4 — rust red heading:

THE RISK
Text:
Poor integration creates hidden manual work
If vendor information does not flow into your mobility platform, someone on your team is doing unnecessary updates, chasing statuses, and filling gaps manually.

At the bottom, add a beige bordered note:

The Balanced View:
A well-designed vendor model does not replace internal capability. It protects what your team does best, fills real gaps with precision, and creates the visibility needed to manage performance and cost in real time.

Right panel title:

How Mobility Teams Are Rebuilding the Model

Create a comparison table with orange header row and columns:

Component | Purpose | What Good Looks Like | Common Failure | Why It Matters

Rows:

Row 1:

Capability Map |
Define internal vs external roles |
Internal work is mapped into three areas: strong capability, inefficient but manageable, and true expertise gaps |
Starting with vendor names instead of operating needs |
Ensures vendors fill gaps instead of replacing strengths

Row 2:

Vendor Segmentation |
Match vendors to the right relationship type |
Suppliers are divided into core partners, specialist providers, and flex capacity |
Every vendor treated like a strategic partner |
Improves cost control, accountability, and fit-for-purpose delivery

Row 3:

SLA Framework |
Measure what matters to the business |
SLAs track time to first response, turnaround, escalation handling, and include consequence clauses |
SLAs built for vendor convenience, not assignee experience |
Creates real accountability instead of passive performance tracking

Row 4:

Tech Integration |
Reduce manual work and status chasing |
Vendor systems connect cleanly with the mobility platform, with clear ownership for any information gaps |
Disconnected workflows and duplicate data entry |
Improves speed, accuracy, and operational efficiency

Row 5:

Cost Governance |
Control spend continuously |
Live dashboard showing spend by vendor, corridor, and case type, with trends and exceptions visible |
Cost reviews only happen at renewal |
Makes overspend visible before it becomes normalized

Style table with alternating light beige rows and clean grid lines.

Section 3: Bottom checklist

Add a large full-width rounded panel with terracotta header bar titled:

Vendor Model 2.0 Readiness Checklist

Under it add small intro text:

Five practical controls every lean mobility team should build before expanding its vendor network.

Then create three side-by-side checklist cards with numbered orange labels:

1 OPERATING MODEL CLARITY
Map internal strengths before reviewing suppliers
Separate efficient internal work from true capability gaps
Build your vendor model around what the team actually needs
Avoid outsourcing work your team already does well
Make role ownership explicit from the start
2 VENDOR STRUCTURE AND CONTROL
Classify vendors as core partners, specialists, or flex capacity
Define SLAs around assignee experience and business impact
Add consequence clauses for repeated underperformance
Review accountability by vendor type, not just by service line
Create a decision path when a vendor consistently misses targets
3 DATA, COST, AND VISIBILITY
Confirm how each vendor connects to your platform
Clarify who owns data gaps and status update failures
Track spend by vendor, corridor, and case type in a live dashboard
Flag exceptions and benchmark pricing continuously
Make vendor cost governance an operating rhythm, not an annual exercise
Footer

Add a black footer strip on the left with white text:

Elena Antoneac
COO, xpath.global

On the right, add:

Internal excellence. External precision.
A smarter vendor model for teams that need leverage without dependency.

Appended to Claude's system prompt whenever this preset is selected. Click Save changes to persist edits.